Rachel Bodine graduated from college with a BA in English. She has since worked as a Feature Writer in the insurance industry and gained a deep knowledge of state and countrywide insurance laws and rates. Her research and writing focus on helping readers understand their insurance coverage and how to find savings. Her expert advice on insurance has been featured on sites like PhotoEnforced, All...

Full Bio →

Written by

Jeffrey Johnson is a legal writer with a focus on personal injury. He has worked on personal injury and sovereign immunity litigation in addition to experience in family, estate, and criminal law. He earned a J.D. from the University of Baltimore and has worked in legal offices and non-profits in Maryland, Texas, and North Carolina. He has also earned an MFA in screenwriting from Chapman Univer...

Full Bio →

Reviewed by Jeffrey Johnson
Insurance Lawyer Jeffrey Johnson

UPDATED: Apr 13, 2022

Advertiser Disclosure

It’s all about you. We want to help you make the right coverage choices.

Advertiser Disclosure: We strive to help you make confident car insurance decisions. Comparison shopping should be easy. We are not affiliated with any one car insurance company and cannot guarantee quotes from any single provider.

Our insurance industry partnerships don’t influence our content. Our opinions are our own. To compare quotes from many different companies please enter your ZIP code on this page to use the free quote tool. The more quotes you compare, the more chances to save.

Editorial Guidelines: We are a free online resource for anyone interested in learning more about car insurance. Our goal is to be an objective, third-party resource for everything car insurance related. We update our site regularly, and all content is reviewed by car insurance experts.

U.S. v. Jones involves police using GPS devices attached to a car without a warrant.
U.S. v. Jones involves police using GPS devices attached to a car without a warrant. (britannica.com)

When you consider the impact GPS has had on driving, it’s easy to see that it’s had a large effect on the way we drive.

Starting off as separate devices drivers could install in their automobiles, they’ve quickly made their way into becoming installed by auto manufacturers as either standard or optional equipment. And with each successive model year, there are more and more cars on the road equipped with on-board GPS navigation systems.

We’ve talked in the past about how such systems can do more harm than good since they can serve as a significant driver distraction. Not extremely interesting, but a case currently before the Supreme Court of the United States, involving a different type of GPS and automobiles, has certainly grabbed our attention.

The case itself is the United States v. Antoine Jones. The details surrounding the case involved the tossing out a conviction on drug conspiracy on Antoine Jones of Maryland.

In his case, government agents put a self-contained GPS device that allowed authorities to track where Jones drove. That tracking allowed the government to conduct a secret investigation of Jones’ activities and was used to compile evidence used to initially convict Jones.

That conviction was overturned since the same FBI agents that conducted the investigation and installed the GPS unit on Jones’ car didn’t have a search warrant. The Obama administration is arguing that police have no requirement to obtain a warrant since they don’t consider the electronic tracking a search.

The government’s argument seemed to stun Chief Justice John Roberts, who asked the Justice Department’s lawyer “so your answer is yes, you could tomorrow decide that you put a GPS device on every one of our cars, follow us for a month; no problem under the Constitution?”

While we don’t expect a decision to be handed down on this case until June 2012, we’d love to know your thoughts. So we’ll go ahead and ask each of you this question:

Should police be able to install a GPS device on your car to track your movements without a search warrant?